This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device. Technorati Profile My Ecosystem Details

the dredwerkz

latest comments:

Not only that | tilda

he's up! | edward

Great question | tilda

Shall I | tilda

Too big! | edward

Explanation | edward

know how | brad

So Brad snagged me a copy of "The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit" and I burned through it over the weekend.

It's a great book, yet it doesn't instinctively rebel against the 50's any more than it embraces that period. Instead, it does a good job at examining a way of life that seems to have disappeared.

I cannot relate to the idea of the "mega-corporation" in which there are thousands of striving middle managers. Almost every firm I've worked for has had a three-tier structure of upper and middle management, and the actual workers beneath them. I've never had to deal with vice-presidents or division heads or section leaders to any extent. As companies continue to flatten out, I can only expect that this trend will continue.

The book clearly doesn't idolize that corporate culture, and it certainly doesn't wax nostalgic about the main couple's home life. We're treated to a view of a somewhat violent father and a naive wife. Early in the novel, when the wife decides to make a change she declares that she'll start to serve "real meals" rather than hamburgers and hot dogs, and that the children will start going to church.

I wonder if, in our current generation, the idea of growing-up has been completely abandoned. There's no need, seemingly anymore, to stop eating the foods we wish, or to have to knuckle down and act mature. Thirty year old childless men with ten year relationships sit down on their couch and fire up video-games for fun. Why should one bother spending two hours creating a meal when one could simply go out to eat?

Of course, I'm not saying that this is bad, by any means. Just that our image of the martini-soaked, white-bread, racists fifties may be somewhat mistaken: perhaps they were just fooling themselves at the same time. Certainly the desire for money, for material goods, has gotten even stronger in the intervening years. When the main character, Tom Rath, muses about getting his children life-insurance, I couldn't help but think that I'd have to be incredibly rich to think about such a mature concept. Who can afford to sock money away for an event one will never be around to see?

My mistake, in hindsight, was transitioning straight from The Man... to American Psycho which describes perfectly the exact same sort of rat race in the 80's. At some point, most people, including myself, will have to slow down or risk burning out. Rath manages to make the transition well. I assume I can do better.

posted at: 2006-01-27 15:45:51 with 2 comments

Comments

life insurance for the kids | helena

Do you mean getting a life insurance policy on yourself so that your kids would be provided for? I think you would think to do that if you had kids...right? Please tell me you are that mature.

posted at: 2006-01-27 22:31:23

perhaps | edward

I suppose it's just a distant thought, at the moment. I finally got renters insurance a couple weeks ago, something I should've done immediately after moving to DC.

It's the health-care dilemna for many americans: unless your employer pays for your health care, most people would rather simply pocket the money and hope for the best. Does this make them immature? No, it just means that they don't have a plan for the future that incorporates known risks. Count me among them.

posted at: 2006-01-31 08:05:06
you must login to post comments; use the form on the left-hand side to do so

go back a week...

...go forward a week