latest comments:
Ok here you go | ronaldOh, wait... | forrest
Comments and clarifications | forrest
right now | edward
monkey | edward
Others | edward
new link | edward
Jill brought this story to my attention:
(WBZ) CHARLESTOWN The Sullivan Square T station and a section of Interstate 93 North in Charlestown were shut down for about an hour Wednesday morning so police could remove and blow up a suspicious device.
A source close to the investigation told WBZ it was a "sophisticated electronic device" that somebody placed there for a reason. It was not an explosive device and police say it did not pose any danger to anyone.
Now, the kicker: go to the site and look at the picture of the device in question!
That's right...they're doing it as hard as they possibly can!
Dear CNN,
If you continue to insist that you have "the most news in the morning" will you kindly refrain from showing segments about Tyra Bank's weight or a racehorse being euthanized? They cheapened an otherwise somber morning show covering politics and the war in Iraq.
Note to programmers: the weather man should be the time for humor and lightheartedness. Everything else that is "news" is typically serious fare, for adults.
Sincerely,
Edward
Highlights from this weekend:
- obtaining vernor's despite the heights' giant being sold out of it
- going bowling
- snow!
- watching bittorrent'd v.mars episodes
Lowlights from this weekend:
- smokin' aces
- bdc misadventures
- republicans in the service industry
You guys?
werkz advice: skip it.
I caught smokin' aces this weekend with Tilda. Despite artificially lowering my expectations, the movie itself failed to live up to the great cast. The main problem was simply the writing of Joe Carnahan and the somewhat idiotic casting (Ryan Reynolds makes no jokes? Alicia Keys as an ambivalent bisexual? Jeremy Piven acting depressed?)
Instead of a nail-biting explosion-laced witty-dialog laden affair, Shane Black-style, we instead get violence without humor, meaningless plot-twists that are foreshadowed hours in advance to the audience and almost no memorable lines or characters.
Forrest noted today a few Democratic Pres/VP combinations:
Obama / Biden or Clinton / Richardson
And his personal suggestion:
Edwards / Biden
What do you guys think? I'm not a huge Biden fan...I actually think Edwards would, once again, make a great VP, but he'd never stoop so low. Richardson has some serious baggage, but the guy's akin to Rendell: a guy's guy who doesn't mince words.
My current favorite would probably be Obama/Clark. Clark's flameout last time around was almost entirely due to his early flatfootedness. Plus, it would defend against any criticism of Obama as "not seasoned enough", freeing Obama to go on the offense on almost all topics, something he's done before.
If you're on facebook, go join obama's group. They're aiming for a million members, which would certainly be something to see...
While you're at it, all good Dems should join the Democratic Party group.
Today's must-read:
Q Here's what Jim Webb, senator from Virginia, said in his Democratic response last night. He said:
"The President took us into the war recklessly. We are now, as a nation, held hostage to the predictable and predicted disarray that has followed."
And it's not just Jim Webb, it's some of your good Republican friends in the Senate and the House, are now seriously questioning your credibility because of the blunders, of the failures. All right, Gordon Smith --
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Wolf, Wolf, I simply don't accept the premise of your question. I just think it's hogwash. Remember --
Q What, that there were no blunders? The President himself says there were blunders --
Read it all.
Ever want to know the full list of gchat/googletalk (the chat feature inside gmail that uses the jabber protocol) smileys? Here they all are!

