latest comments:
also | edwardWow | ronald
simple solution | edward
noodles | edward
disruptive smile | edward
But I've set the bar so low... | helena
well... | helena
It's the cliched driver's ed real world problem: a deer leaps out at you, what do you do? The correct answer, of course, depends greatly on your vehicle. In general, running over a deer is much better for your car than having said deer slam into your windshield, so tapping the brakes is normally bad.
Except, in this case, the deer was on the ground already. This morning. Almost in Tyson's corner.
I slammed on the brakes, giving the driver behind me enough time to slow as well, and bringing my car so close that I could no longer even see the deer. (For a second, I thought it was under the car.) I popped out of my mini and saw it, sitting in the road, blood coming out of its mouth and a clearly broken leg. Whoever hit it must have driven off only seconds earlier, because the blood on the ground was bright red.
Hesitating, I picked up the deer and carried it across the small back road toward the deeper woods (thinking, all the while, as the deer kicked it's bad leg futilely, that if a car popped over the ridge and hit me while carrying the deer to safety, it wouldn't be funny) which took a little effort. Once I got it to the right side, it crawled under a tree and rested.
Does a broken leg mean a deer is as good as dead? It's not like I even could kill it, so bringing it to the side was all I could think of. Fortunately, its leg was hurt badly enough that I'm not concerned it'll stumble back into the road. I was somewhat angry at the other driver, because by hitting the deer and leaving it there, they ensured it would almost cause another accident. I don't blame people for running into deer, but I do blame people who leave messes for others to clean up.
Airlines have begun offering first-class and frequent flyers special lines to reach the TSA security checkpoints.
A lot of people are bothered by this, but so long as the implementation remains consistent with the idea that "[the airlines] control the front of the line and [TSA] control[s] the checkpoint," I think this is actually a good idea. The actual "getting from point A to point B" part of air travel is a commodity product, but there is a legitimate product distinction to be made based on the experience you have doing it (e.g. you should have to pay more for increased convenience, more legroom, better food, last-minute purchase, easy itinerary changes, etc.).
Separate metal detectors and X-ray machines for first class is a bad implementation, though.
Welcome to Hell I guess is the best way to start. Wow so I picked up the Express this morning per my usual and was excited because there was a Panda Cub plastered on the front. Now one would think two things: either this will be a good read today or wow they must be setting me up for a lot of bad news. Not being a downer I choose the former, but man I could not have been more wrong. So today we spand from poor use of recess appointment, to Raffy Doping, more charges against Gitmo, Shuttle Repairs that are dangerous, Possible Ecological disaster, Riots in Sudan, Saudi King Dies, Iraq not able to agreee on a Constitution, fucking dismembered girl in a truck being thrown into a river in N.J., and so on. I mean what the hell are you supposed to think when all this shit is going one. Well I hope I improved everyones day with my little slice of happiness. To do my part though to make people a bit happier here are pics of my sisters garden in a box. I think that they are very beautiful and hay they make me a little happier.
San Francisco! That's where I am!
My room is next to the vending machine...
CON: Sounds like people are trying to break my door down all night. PRO: My room is next to the vending machine!
so i guess most 'werkzites know that i have a perpetual grin, probably due to my lack of a functioning memory (that or i really have led a charmed life - you decide)...but lately the jack nicholson has been aiding me in previous unheard-of ways. naturally i think those who check this site may be able to help me solve this mystery, provided they can act like meddling kids for a minute. curious?
call it the smile theory. started about a week ago while waiting for the bus. a girl walked by, dressed in the oh-so-typical fashion of g-town trendy students who take the g-town bus to rosslyn before boarding the hardly-proletariat metro. normally we betied bums heading the other direction view these young, perfectly coiffed boys and girls with a bit of wry amusement, but despite the ungodly hour i decided to smile. naturally she smiled back, but then i noticed that she was holding a box of crack circles and so i smiled at them too. she paused, stopped next to me, opened the box, and offered me a free slice of deliciousness.
okay, just a lucky morning, right? flash forward a day or two and at the local eatery i found myself ordering some spicy barbacoa-laced tacos. behind the counter there were a few chuckles, so i glanced up and smiled. get to the register, the girl asks if i want anything to drink. i say something witty about loving the hot sauce - she says are you sure you're okay. i say yes and she says the meal is free.
now admittedly something was going on, and i did say yes in spanish, which might have led her to believe that i could understand what they were chuckling about - not knowing that my spanish is as rusty as my esperanto. but that would be a one off experience.
and this afternoon i went back, apartmentmate in tow, ordered even more food and a couple of drinks, and then deployed the smile. that's right. free again. so there you have it - an old trick seems to have gained me some new powers. should i use them for good or evil, to fight others' hunger, or my own? you make the call. i suppose i should wonder why grinning vacuously hasn't gotten me stuff before, but i'm not going to look a gift horse in the mouth...
So, does anyone have any clever flea weapons in his/her arsenal? No, Reese is clean, but his best friend Mariposa is decidedly not. So, they can't hang out. Actually I think Reese is enjoying the break. He's alot cooler than Mariposa and she gets on his nerves with her constant neediness. Still, considering that people are suffering here, any non-chemical remedies would be much appreciated. No, that's not a hippie Berkeley thing, although Mariposa is on a bunch of herbs for all her issues, and she was rejected from acupuncture... But fleas call for real weapons and Mariposa's parents actually think they may have used too many pesticides in their apartment and yard over time so that they have created a generation of mutant super fleas. Yeah, it's bad. Posey spent most of last week in Reno, because fleas don't live in Reno.
The positive side is that when Reese can't go on play dates with Posey, I get more exercise. I've heard that's good for me, but ever since I left team sports, I haven't been able to permanently embrace it as a way of life. There were the racquetball days -- wild, angry times when Ed and Brad would beat me every single game, almost always by just a point or few. Good times, but I think any benefits were negated by a diet of egg noodles. Yep, those were the egg noodle days, which came just after the potato days. Or was it the other way around? Either way, starchtastic!
The internets are "broken" at work. Hence no posts.
I was going to write a quick-n-dirty call-out to certain people to get them to post in my absence. Fortunately Forrest has already made them look bad. But let's do it anyway:
- Dwight - hey, man, where's the latest update of the outsider's guide to anime? Or some new music reviews?
- Brad - well, you know you need to post some movies up on the site. I mean, come on, I've seen a few with you I deferred so that you could.
- Jenna - okay, so you have a blog. Whoop-de-do. Dinosaur Comics was brilliant. Sysadmin Day was not. How about some more gossip and less humor?
- Helena - hmm. the cookie post was excellent, as all of your posts normally are. so why don't you post more? hell, just once every two days would make a huge difference. your dog alone has more fun adventures than i do at fast food places...
- Deborah - adding your craigslist posting to the site has to be a new low. asking about screen on the green was fine, however. unlike jenna, you've had a blog for awhile. so how's-about posting some personal stuff?
- Ronald - now that you're staying in dc, you should have plenty of time to update stuff. hell, cross-post stuff from your regular blog here. why? because most people don't read your blog, but more would if you posted the info here and included a link back to your site. got it? good.
- Forrest - you win a cookie. now go back inside.
- Jill - read the advice to forrest. cross-post. it's been ages since you've linked to any lobster related material on the site.
- Fincher - i know, you're busy. but keep those great food reviews coming. and try to beef them up a bit with, you know, actual commentary. i may be too busy to call, but at least i still post.
- Kevin - we need much much more. look here! yes, it's a post by you! amazing! Now rinse, lather and repeat...
Okay, time to get back to work. By the word "broken" above, I meant that somehow my T1 line has been reduced to 50kbs. Yes, that's a k. Not fun at all.
A woman from Brookings / GW held a chat today on the subjects of the Bolton appointment, recess appointments generally, and the filibuster. I thought "Philadelphia, PA" had a particularly insightful question (wink, wink), as did Prof. Binder.
Philadelphia, Pa.: It's true that the filibuster isn't included in Article One of the Constitution, but that Article does give the Senate the authority to determine the "Rules of its Proceedings." Given the Senate's legacy as an institution that values giving strong-willed individual Senators anti-majoritarian power, what in particular makes you think the 1806 creation of the filibuster was just an inadvertant mistake that took on a life of its own?
Sarah Binder: Great question. You are absolutely correct that the Constitution grants the House and Senate the right to set their own chamber rules. So, yes, there are constitutional grounds for the Senate selecting whichever set of rules that it desires.
But I also believe from my digging in Senate history that there's a lot of myth about early senators' commitment to individual and minority rights. There seemed to have been an expectation in the first decades of the Senate that a majority was sufficient to pass legislative measures. Even the great senators of the 19th century preferred majority cloture-- Henry Clay, Daniel Webster and others fought for reinstating the previous question motion. Steven Smith and I have developed this argument further in our 1997 Brookings book: Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate. A shameless plug, perhaps, but we try to address the types of very interesting questions you have raised.
Thanks!
Professor Binder's book may well adequately address the obvious follow-up question, but she didn't: Even if "the great Senators" preferred majority cloture, it's pretty clear that the Senate as a decision-making body didn't, or they would've reinstated the "previous question motion" at some point between 1806 and now. Isn't that fairly good evidence as to the Senate's longstanding intent not to close debate without a 60 vote supermajority?
True, the Senate's rules have probably been used to stymie beneficial action as often as they've been used to prevent tyranny by the majority. Also true, the Senate's counter-majoritarian tendencies (exemplified by the lack of direct election until the 1900s) were probably first established to safeguard wealthy elites--who already had power--from the unwashed hordes, rather than to safeguard the marginalized and downtrodden. However, that just goes to show the genius of the Framers: They recognized that there's always a need for tools to protect the minority in a liberal democracy. More to the point, they recognized that no true liberal democracy can allow its President to run roughshod just because he got 51% of the vote.
Whenever I get into a debate about the relative merits of the NYT vs the WaPo, my trump card is always the bizarre Judy Miller. That the Times would continue to employ such a person as a reporter is idiotic. But sadly, many of Miller's wacky antics aren't well known. Luckily for those not in the know, Arianna sums them all up here in a fairly easy to read piece.
Go check it out.
Back yet? Okay. Can you imagine if, for instance, the WaPo embedded Charles Krauthammer into a military unit designed to catch UBL? And if he reported back from the field with blatant spin and lies (a typical CK piece, in other words) and got them in print? On a bad day, CK is still, at best, mired in the opinion section of the WaPo. No reporters (Susan Schmidt maybe...) at the WaPo seem to be even half as bad as Miller.
Ugh.
Come on, Tony, run already okay? Do people not remember the previous pack of mayors? They all stank. You, alone, managed to pull us out of the muck. Slowly (some would say in SE, too slowly) it's true, but DC is coming back after a long drought.
Cropp I just cannot stand. Her disastrous plan to shelve the "bonds for libraries and stadiums" proposal until an undetermined future date managed to accomplish two things: it ensured the stadium would still get built, but that no money would be raised for local needs. She brings a new meaning to the term sell-out.
I woke up this morning, opened my covers, and found a boot in my bed. Odd.
yes, yes, it's my boot, but still...
This story is why contractors tend to stink. Why couldn't the government have done this quicker and cheaper? The irony is that the purpose of the contract in question was to hire private people to become government baggage screeners. Idiotic.
It's one of those mornings that I realize, driving to work on the parkway with blue skies and cool temps, that I have lost count of the things I do not deserve. I raced a guy in a jag...we were poking along until the right moment came in the song I was listening to and I downshifted to fifth gear, hit the accelerator and the two of us weaved through traffic until the beltway and backroads entered the picture. Taking Jenna to work was a breeze earlier, as the traffic in georgetown was non-existent. Everything seemed clearer. Everything seemed brighter.
Fortunately, the multitude of work awaiting me here snapped me out of my reverie. Of course, all it takes to get back into it is to turn around and look out my enormous windows to see the lake, geese and the prospect of an enjoyable lunch break.
So about two months ago, I signed up for a research panel designed around consumer purchasing habits. I thought it'd entail the regular amount of survey filling, etc., but to my surprise, they shipped me a fully functional bar-code scanner/modem that would allow me to scan every item I purchased. Excited, I broke the box down and began to play with it.
The scanner looked like an ice pick, with a small red led point that emerged from one end or the other. In addition to scanning UPC codes, you could also enter stored you purchased items from, and even enter in items without codes, using a special codebook. So far, so good. After scanning in the items, you'd hold the speaker in the scannerpick up to a modem, Wargames-style, and it'd call back to HQ to report in. Testing that out was fun too.
Eager to start, I instructed Jenna not to unpack any of the groceries I had just purchased from the store. I got ready to scan, cracked open the instruction book, and read that before I scanned any items, I needed to update the store list. Sounds simple, right? Inside a huge booklet was a list of every DC store imaginable from which I could purchase goods. The instructions said to scan each one into the scanner (well, each one I could ever conceivably shop at) so I began the arduous task of scanning in every code from Dean and Deluca to the CVS at Thomas Circle. Why do I say arduous?
Well, the icepick scanner had one major deficiency: instead of using a powerful laser to scan UPCs, it used a lower power one or an led that emerged from a single point. Thus, instead of holding the entire code under the laser as most scanners at stores do, the pick had to be dragged across the code. At. A. Constant. Speed.
The instruction manual said to "do it briskly" as one would "light a match". I tried brisk. I tried quick. I tried slow. I tried medium-speed. Occasionally a store would register, sometimes even on the first try. Others I'd spend ten minutes simply running the scannerpick on top of, over and over again. After I registered about 10 stores over the course of an house, I realized that if it took me this long to scan 10 stores, how long would it take me to scan 10 items from said stores? Disgusted, I put the scannerpick away.
Late last week, I received a notice from homescan saying they wanted their scanner back. I dutifully packed it back up and shipped it off. What was especially frustrating was that I, of all people, wholly support the idea of tracking my consumer habits. But if AmEx can give me a yearly statement that shows me how much I spent on dining, on tips and on purchases at the gas station, why should anyone have to go through the hassle of scanning particular items a second time, after someone else has already done so at the store itself?
In the end, I flipped through the homescan catalog of "rewards" for customers. You'd get a dvd player if you scanned each week, every week, all year. That's over 52 transmissions. Given the amount of purchases I made, I could spend two weeks just scanning stuff to transmit. Just so I get a lousy $200 dvd player. I mean, come on. I did market research for Network Solutions once and got $200 in half an hour of looking at a website and clicking on some hyperlinks. That beats two weeks any day.
So maybe the technology is not there yet. But I'm sure that there are others like me who'd gladly give up the farce people call privacy these days in order to be market indicators. Just tie our habits to our credit cards, okay? Or put some RFID chips in our products and have the scanner check them wirelessly, okay? That way you'd know not only what was purchased, but how long it lasted before it broke. And that could be the end of planned obsolescence.
This is nauseating.
Andrew H. Card Jr. had some candid advice for 2,000 Washington interns who gathered at the Ronald Reagan Building on Monday evening to hear him speak at an event intended to recruit talented people into the federal civil service. Some of you should go corporate, the White House chief of staff told them.
"There are many programs for young people to have employment opportunities, but the greatest employment opportunities in our society come through the private sector," said Card, a former vice president of General Motors Corp. and ex-president of the American Automobile Manufacturers Association. "And so I don't think that everyone who is looking for a job should expect or even want a job with the federal government or one of our agencies. In fact, our economy would not do very well if people just worked for the government."
Occasionally a Republican slips up and says the truth, rather than their talking points. They really do, honestly, hate the government. The force that has liberated nations, helped the less fortunate and put a man on the moon is, in their mind, something to loathe. That sentiment disgusts me. What could be a nobler calling than to serve one's country? Card should at least offer some explanation.
A fun new public search site.
Actually, it's been up since February, but still, it's cool. Some people apparently don't think so. In my mind, if this is all public information, the silliest quote comes here in the piece:
"It's a fundamental invasion of privacy because they've put all these records together and give them away for nothing instead of keeping them separate and making people pay to get them."
Um, so if zaba charged money for their service, would it be any less an invasion of privacy? I don't think so. It'd just mean that rich people could snoop on others exclusively. I've never understood why so many people seem to think that public information must be protected. It's self-defeating. Just like the weather companies complaining that the national weather service is, gasp, letting people check the weather for free, if the government has this information and is making it public, isn't that good? I long for the day the IRS allows completely free digital submissions of tax returns for all Americans. Over the web. It'll happen eventually, trust me.
But to get back to the point, go check out zava and find out about the people you want to!
- Recovering from illness? Check.
- Record high temperatures? Check.
- Loss of power over the entire house? Check.
- Another great Tuesday Salon? You bet.
Sometimes minor inconveniences seem to add up, but last night, chilling with friends outside the darkened 'werkz, I realized that with a fully stocked ice pit, almost any obstacle can be overcome. Sure enough, after a lengthy time, the power came back on, the party faithful returned inside, and all was again right with the world.
Well, it's time for another salon. I'll be working hard this time to keep the inside of the house super-cool, so be sure to come on by.
Last night, I caught my first screen-on-the-green this year, "Treasure of the Sierra Madre". A good film all around, and it was fun to see it with Kristen and friends. That cooler is pretty heavy, though...
werkz advice: skip it.
So I finally caught Scorsese's "The Aviator". Not really that good, actually. It wasn't due to bad acting, or an uninteresting topic. It just never took off. Instead, the movie seemed long and dull. Still, better than Gangs, I suppose.
werkz advice: skip it.
So I finally caught Wes Anderson's latest flick "The Life Aquatic". Let me save you the trouble of renting it. Don't. It's not as good as either of Anderson's earlier works. Why? Because it's just not that funny. It's all somewhat campy, in a bad way.
So I upgrade to the latest firefox, 1.0.6 and gmail starts to act funny. This morning, it doesn't even come up at all. After a little hacking, I get it to display the following message:
Hello,
Our system has detected abnormal usage of your Gmail account. As a result, we have temporarily disabled access to this account.
It will take between one minute and 24 hours for you to regain access, depending on the behavior our system detected.
Nice. So I decide to download the bleeding version of Firefox, Deer Park Alpha 2 and what'dya know? gmail is now working again.

