don't see this
latest comments:
The Metro police nailed another person recently, this time for cursing loudly into her cell-phone.
Again, I think this is fine. A few high-profile incidents like this, and people will start to treat the Metro with more respect. A zero-tolerance policy is exactly why Metro has remained so good, despite its lousy service. If you're going to be packed like sardines into a car and have every other escalator broken, at least you can appreciate the calm, quiet commute.
I saw a prostitute near my old house today.
It was early in the morning.
So yesterday good ole' rummy said elections in most of iraq were acceptable. in fact, he said, "...so you have an election that's not quite perfect. Is it better than not having an election? You bet."
yikes, stop, hold your horses. elections in most places are ok? this sort of controvenes the universal suffrage form of democracy we tend to espouse. what's next? only male iraqis owning 2 acres of land an not living in fallujah can vote?
let's forget for a moment the practical reasons rushing elections can be a disaster. bosnia held elections very quickly and elected a nationalist government. afghanistan's elections put election workers into an environment where they create violence. instead, let's just remember that we may not want the world to observe how we talked a great game about bringing democracy to iraq, and then turned the country into florida.
Read Milbank's latest article. I still would like to see anyone name a reporter from that other paper who is as skilled. And, unlike previous times, this time the editors moved the article to A1. All Dana needs now is to sneak above the fold to cement the WaPo's status as the best paper in the country. The other paper, by contrast, today ran a front-page story on the last time Kerry lost a campaign, which, unsurprisingly, has nothing to do with today.
Again, I think the other paper has a better editorial page. And I think the LA Times has terrific international news coverage. But for domestic politics and coverage of this administration, you can't beat the Washington Post.
Wow. Kerry looks so much stronger on offense than defense. His speech at Temple University today was a knockout punch. The video isn't up yet, but when it is, I encourage everyone to go watch it. In the interim, go read the speech.
Wow. Bush's Rose Garden conference was a doozy. Let's see the clip that will be the most widely talked about:
Q Mr. President and Mr. Prime Minister, I'd like to ask about the Iraqi people. Both of you have spoken for them today. And yet over the past several months there have been polls conducted by the Coalition Provisional Authority, by the Oxford Institute and other reputable organizations that have found very strong majorities do not see the United States as a liberator but as an occupier, are unhappy with American policy and want us out. Don't the real voices of the Iraqi people themselves contradict the rosy scenarios you're painting here today?
PRESIDENT BUSH: Let me start by that. You said the poll was taken when the CPA was there?
Q (Off mike.)
PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah, okay. Let me stop you. First of all, the Iraqi people now have got Iraqi leadership.
Prime Minister Allawi and his cabinet are making decisions on behalf of the Iraqi people.
Secondly, I saw a poll that said the right track/wrong track in Iraq was better than here in America. (Chuckles.) It's pretty darn strong. I mean, the people see a better future. Talk to the leader. I agree: I'm not the expert on how the Iraqi people think, because I live in America, which is nice, safe and secure. But I talk to this man.
Um, that's idiotic. The right track/wrong track number is better in Iraq than in America? And Bush's rejoinder is that America is "nice, safe and secure"? I guess Bush really is living in fantasy-land Good to see Kerry calling him on it.
So, I've been out of commission a few days with what I call a tummy bug. Not so fun. I returned to work today to learn that a very large contingent of people have been suffering the very same ailment. Turns out, we all ate the same catered lunch for a meeting on Friday. The plot thickens. Now investigations are underway -- from the sound of it, I was lucky enough to get one of the milder cases. People went to the hospital; one man's temperature dropped six degrees.
Drama central. You just don't go poisoning a pack of lawyers.
Oh, and I'm also disappointed that I missed National Talk Like a Pirate Day -- I reminded myself last week and then...I'll blame it on the illness...I forgot.
So it seems ACT is pulling out of Michigan. I wonder why?
Perhaps this explains it.
American Muslim voters are overwhelmingly supporting Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush, according to a new American Muslim Poll conducted by Zogby International for Georgetown University’s Muslims in the American Public Square (Project MAPS). By a margin of 76% to 7%, Muslims back the Kerry/Edwards ticket over the incumbent Bush/Cheney ticket. This is a stark reversal of fortunes from the 2000 election for Mr. Bush.
Michigan is moving into a lock for us, which means we can focus on Florida and Ohio. And that's bad news for Bush.
Likewise, it seems like the GOP has lost yet another group of voters who are disenchanted with their knuckle dragging approach to civil liberties. The Republican Party is still just as white as ever and given current population trends, they're going to be permanent minority soon.
In other news, check out the New Partnership For America's Future. The document is a little religious, but nice. I'm telling you: the similarities to '94 just keep on coming. Except we're in the driver's seat this time.
Read this post by Juan Cole about what America would look like if it were Iraq. Remember those pictures painted earlier by Rumsfeld about how the violence in Iraq was not unlike DC. This is the definitive take-down of that fallacy.
Then read this q-and-a session from the administration's "Ask the White House" website. It occurred yesterday and is directed at White House Communications Director Dan Bartlett. The questions are tough. Real tough. It makes one realize why the administration has been resisting putting Bush in front of the cameras recently.
Which was why yesterday's impromptu press conferenc by Kerry was so important. Kerry's people are starting to realize that they need to rebut arguments made by Bush in the same news cycle. The result? The subsequent analysis of Bush's own speech to the U.N. becomes tougher and harder hitting.
Finally, here's your early morning hubris check. Richard Perle said the following at an American Enterprise Institute conference on September 22, 2003:
"A year from now I'd be surprised if there's not some grand square in Baghdad that is named after President Bush."
I, unlike Seymour Hersh, actually am an optimist and think that democracy is a laudable goal for all people. That doesn't mean I'm an idiot like Perle though...the neocons flaw is not that they are utopians, it is that they are willing to risk lives, ignore contrary evidence and show a lack of knowledge about reality to further their goals. In that manner, the idea that we would be "greeted as liberators" is naive in hindsight, but not a big problem if you bring in 200k+ troops because you've planned for the possibility that they won't be quite so enthusiastic. The neocons fervent belief in their own ideas is their blind spot: they failed to plan for the peace, and in fact, worked hard against planning for bad scenarios. That's not optimism, that's ignorance.
All you need to know about the weekend is that I forgot Talk Like a Pirate Day was on Sunday.
I've added an outlook appointment to occur every year so that I'll never forget it, so long as I am employed at my current firm.
Argh!
Okay, this poll just came out showing Kerry with a commanding lead in Oregon. Odd, considering that yesterday this poll came out showing Bush with a commanding lead...and let's not forget Zogby's poll from a week and half ago.
The swing is 11 points from poll to poll to poll. Yes, if we examine the margin of error of both polls it is theoretically possible that both could be near the outliers and the race could be right in the middle.
More likely, however, is the possibility that one of the two polls is misusing the "likely voter" model. As I have harped on before to co-workers, typically most polls survey a large group of voters. They publish these numbers under the "registered voters" group. But to cull out the people they don't think will be showing up on November 2, they apply a methodology which varies from poll to poll. As [Zogby points out], small changes in the percentage of voters who identify themselves with a political party can have a huge effect, because the electorate is so polarized.
So, if I take a survey and the people who answer the phone are 34% Dems, 33% GOP and 32% Independents, and the survey shows Bush and Kerry locked in a dead heat, changing the ratio to 29D/37R/33I can swing the race to appear to be Bush's to lose.
As the race tightens, the registered voter models are going to show Kerry leading, with the "likely voter" models of Gallup, et al., showing Bush with a rapidly decreasing lead. My prediction, made several times in the past, is that the polls aren't showing the changing dynamics on the ground, because pollsters are trying to compensate for increasing numbers of the electorate saying that they are Democrats and are likely voters. The true numbers won't be known until the day of election.
Finally, I've altered the code on the main page. Now when you click on a staff member's title, it will take you to his/her staff page. More changes are in the works, so be sure to update your staff page today!