This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device. Technorati Profile My Ecosystem Details

the dredwerkz

latest comments:

there's some major new revisions in the works for the werkz...a new section, several new subsections, and two new features of the user interface; hopefully i can get this stuff done in the next two weeks; until then, you'll just have to be patient...
posted at: 2002-06-07 07:37:56 with 0 comments
once, again, brad "i'm not a self-promoting whore" has failed to link to his own new pieces; this is dredwerkz blasphemy: check out his blistering review of 1223 and his much less derogatory review of felix. we may have a legitimate critic on our hands, as opposed to the psychotic idiots who live in the landscape now known as cultural criticism. at least he managed to get the links correct...
posted at: 2002-06-06 08:48:58 with 0 comments
still not on the blog gravy train, especially when you realize someone might actually dig this stuff up years from now. i'm counting on the flood of information to thoroughly overwhelm anyone - if i can pulse info so fast that no group of humans could search it convincingly...

you think i'm joking, don't you. the concept is pretty simple - kinda like a pyramid scheme or a chain letter. the trick is to reach the threshold at which the information produces itself. in a way it resembles a virus replicating, except it is simply information being generated and passed on by other users.

there are actually advertisers who are making money on this concept already. essentially they take a cool, offbeat ad, and upload it to a few sites on the 'net, and let the users take over. funky, fun ads will get passed along as people find them - passed to other consumers, all not through force but through soft power. pretty sweet, eh?

my twist is that it would not be one ad, or even one piece of info, but rather a 'buzz' about someone or something. the rumors, spin, and half-truths should get people to create content, and then of course advertisers will get interested, and eventually people will blog about it or them. now it doesn't have to be me initially, but if i get myself pushed around like a commodity, then ultimately there will be so much crap out there, generated by common users, that no one will be able to wade through it all. i need density on all levels though - corporate and personal, so that someone couldn't just filter out crappy home pages. this thing has to be big.

where to begin? how about a test. my favorite cartoon is perfect. go dragonball z! now you do a search and start trying to backtrack just one piece of info. say, um, some obscure fact about one of the central characters (marginal characters facts get prime time - oddly. witness the 'fett' phenom in SW)

now that you're interested, i guess i should let you down. i was just testing to see if i could blog a link successfully. the idea is crap. but pass it and this site along to friends, and see what their reactions are! fun for the whole family - then you can write into the advice section and we will answer your angst. be seeing you...

posted at: 2002-06-05 22:47:43 with 0 comments
1223 has got it all. there's the prime location (south of dupont on conn.) and the prime amount of money you gotta spend to get in. prime line? i wouldn't know, because after one trip i didn't really think i needed to return.

that is, until i become filthy rich and begin patterning my life like a well tanned european with money to burn. ooh...did i say 'eurotrash'? didn't mean to. well, maybe just a little.

the problem with MCCXXIII, or '23' as i would prefer to call it - is that there's no bang for your buck, or even a reasonable correlation. there are much better clubs, insanely better restaurants, and even mildly better lounges, so what is the appeal?

quite simply, money. MONEY. drinks are not cheap, and neither are the clientele. they are not, unfortunately, dc's hottest and youngest, but rather, dc's richest and ugliest. kinda like if you took the regular thirty something who goes to reef - put on too much cologne or makeup (or both?) and gave them enough money to buy the standard club outfit. for the guys, that's simple. dark shirt, dark pants, square shoes, and a dark tan. for the ladies - as always, it is up to you to set the standards, and 23-ites do their best to look like displaced new jersey.

enough bad vibes. the good stuff? great space. cool to eat, hang, chill, or even dance on the tiny floor. but it is definitely not cool enough. if only the people watching was good, but you have to stay up late for that, and at these drink prices - i'm heading across the street for some much better action.

ciao, 23. my german pants are getting tired of your pretension...

posted at: 2002-06-05 22:31:17 with 0 comments
it is not the newest, or the oldest on the block, but 'felix' definitely has its appeal. so you're in adams morgan on a saturday night, but you have a hankering for the sort of waiting-in-line experience that you would normally get downtown or near dupont.

yeah, felix is what you're looking for. bar/restaurant/club/lounge - the actual insides contain enough to satisfy anyone. theme? kinda sophisticated yet unpretentious, and it changes based on the room and time. looking for quiet? try the spy lounge just up from the north bar...early on thursday. its got good lighting, enough plushness to sink into a good conversation, and you can wax philosophically about the perpetual showings of 'goldfinger' and 'the pink panther' on the small tv/fireplace.

the north bar has more action, less privacy. great drinks, but the restrooms are placed inconveniently. over on the south side, you have a restaurant area, another bar, and another lounge. here things really heat up when a live musical act is playing - they've got quite a bit of diversity on the playlist, so check ahead if you have strong prefs.

upstairs? there's some funky hip hop on floor two + plus lounge/bar, and another lounge on the third floor. lots of lounging? you bet. a bit of a knockoff of eighteenth street lounge? um, you didn't hear it here first.

but it is not a bad rip. felix is calmer, less trendy, and more adams-morgan than the dupont scene. better diversity than most, but it still feels upscale (hey, its neighbors are bars, dives, and college dance clubs - what wouldn't be classier?) lines aren't too bad - even on saturdays, and it is worth it to have a decent martini and strike up conversation with someone who doesn't work on the hill.

keep lounging felix - we'll get there again soon...

posted at: 2002-06-05 22:18:35 with 0 comments
that's right, everyone's favorite browser has finally notched the legendary 1.0.0 version number...despite being a day late and a dollar short, the mightly lizard has managed to produce a beast of a browser, managing to neatly support most of the w3 standards while still remaining fast and user-friendly. Best of all, you can get it with svg support embedded! their servers appear to be housed at the moment though, so go over here in a few hours when things have calmed down a bit. after several years of using IE as my browser of choice, mozilla has won my heart back.
posted at: 2002-06-05 14:49:29 with 0 comments
yeah, that's right! we just won against portugal. a great win against a good team...arena's tactical decision not to play mathis seems brilliant now, and group d is going to be really shaken up. bring on the koreans monday morning (yes, it's going to hurt to watch at 2:30)! meanwhile, back in the real (i.e. non-world-cup-obsessed) world, almost all of the washingtonpost staff have witheld their bylines in an attempt to draw attention to management playing hardball with the reporter's guild. go reporters!
posted at: 2002-06-05 06:54:54 with 0 comments
a blog, by its nature, is personal; regardless of whether one espouses progressive or moderate viewpoints, the blog itself is a reflection of an author's personality; by allowing multiple people to contribute to a blog, it becomes a collective, much like tapped. this reflects upon the shared nature of the people who contribute; being personal, however, should a collective blog include individual items? for example, i went up to a lake in new england over the weekend and got some sun and fun (props to ms. m for a delightful time!); if i had a personal blog, i might have mentioned this along with a requisite link to the lake but is this a good thing? i guess, in the end, that i think mixing what you ate for breakfast along with the latest political snafu makes things seem genuine...as if telling the truth about where i went over the weekend translates into truth about the other comments. the mind makes the intellectual jump, despite it being logically incoherent...penalizing stupid people in the process. i'm all in favor of stupidity traps.
posted at: 2002-06-04 12:10:39 with 0 comments
everyone's been through it before: the new boss/neighbor/co-worker/friend's significant other/in-law whom you're meeting for the first time. you'd like to hit it off well, because you know you'll be seeing them for a long time. in the fbi's case, they'll be using the services of the cia to help them rebuild their intelligence analyzing and in general, to make less errors. so what happens next? well, the fbi promptly draws up a Cya document (the post nicely punned cya as "cover your agency") detailing how the cia messed up. in response, the cia leaked that they had, in fact, told the fbi the information it needed. besides the rather obvious idea that the fbi has no chance of reforming, they've manged to neatly tick off the very people they need to reorganize. here's what happens next. if this were your neighbor, you'd have to invite them over for dinner to make peace; sadly, i can't see this happening any time soon. the especially frustrating part of all of this is that time is being spent preparing documents and graphs to show who's to blame, not spent on improving things. if only we had a president who would do the right thing regardless of the political fallout, instead of resorting to tired cliches about what the american people say. if you read nothing else, read the last piece. it's a gem.
posted at: 2002-06-04 08:21:15 with 0 comments

Welcome to The Dredwerkz Archives. There are four ways to search through old posts on the website:

  1. Go back and look at the site at a particular day/time/year.
  2. Click on a list of pre-defined dates.
  3. Search using keywords.
  4. Search using our search engine.

There are advantages and disadvantages to each. I'll outline the methods below.

  1. Every post on the website has a timecode stamped to it that looks something like this: http://dredwerkz.com/archive:2003-01-24/10:21:30/. It's fairly intuitive, and using that sequence of year-month-date, you can easily navigate through the past months and years of the site. (If you wish to omit the time, you can: it automatically assumes 11:59pm if you do so.) Using this method, however, does mean that one cannot use method #3 simultaneously.

  2. Rather than list every time and date for the past several years on this post, I'll just link to this article which does so. I may not be super-vigilant about updating that article, but I'll try my best.

  3. The keyword search is explained here. Essentially, you can use keywords (or "tags" as they're known) to look for particular articles on the site. The advantage to this is that your results are easy to see. The disadvantage is that you cannot combine the tags with the archive (from #1 above) so if you choose popular tags, you'll need to add more tags to the mix to filter things down to a reasonable size. To look for a post about bush and polls, for instance, you could type in http://dredwerkz.com/bush/poll/ and get back several results.

  4. The regular, ordinary search engine has been offline for awhile. Once it goes back online, it will be located right here. The advantage to this search engine is that you can search through all the words in an article, rather than just the keywords. The disadvantage is that, currently, you cannot search for words of 3 or less letters. (It's a problem with the engine, not my coding!)

If all else fails, you can always head over to the internet archive to see what this site has looked like in the past. Unlike the four methods outlined above, the archive will also show you what the site itself looked like (style/color/images) in the past, which is mildly amusing to peruse.

posted at: 2002-06-03 13:00:07 with 0 comments

after some careful web log analysis i realized that certain spiders need to have a link to each article in order to log the information contained therein; unfortunately, since i've now set a 7-10 article limit on most subsections, items that are old get pushed into the archives more quickly than spiders can search them; (the archive subsection/tutorial, fortunately, should never have more than 7 articles in it!) although you can easily use the wayback machine to get them, there is no hard-coded link to these articles; to remedy this, i'm now incorporating a series of anchor links to various weeks into this article; this way one can simply click on the link to go back to a particular week; i'll keep it up to date, adding new weeks, as time goes on; well, here goes:

two thousand and five

February
January

two thousand and four

september twenty-sixth
september nineteenth
september twelfth
september fifth

august twenty-ninth
august twenty-second
august fifteenth
august eighth
august first

july twenty fifth
july eighteenth
july eleventh
july fourth

june twenty-seventh
june twentieth
june thirteenth
june sixth

may thirtieth
may twenty-third
may sixteenth
may ninth
may second

april twenty fifth
april eighteenth
april eleventh
april fourth

march twenty-eighth
march twenty-first
march fourteenth
march seventh

february twenty ninth
february twenty second
february fifteenth
february eighth
february first

january twenty fifth
january eighteenth
january eleventh
january fourth



two thousand and three



december twenty-eighth
december twenty-first
december fourteenth
december seventh

november thirtieth
november twenty-third
november sixteenth
november ninth
november second

october twenty-sixth
october nineteenth
october twelfth
october fifth

september twenty-eighth
september twenty-first
september fourteenth
september seventh

august thirty-first
august twenty-fourth
august seventeenth
august tenth
august third

july twenty-seventh
july twentieth
july thirteenth
july sixth

june twenty-ninth
june twenty-second
june fifteenth
june eighth
june first

may twenty fifth
may eighteenth
may eleventh
may fourth

april twenty-seventh
april twentieth
april thirteenth
april sixth

march thirtieth
march twenty-third
march sixteenth
march ninth
march second

february twenty-third
february sixteenth
february ninth
february second

january twenty-sixth
january nineteenth
january twelfth
january fifth



two thousand and two



december twenty-ninth
december twenty-second
december fifteenth
december eighth
december first

november twenty-fourth
november seventeenth
november tenth
november third

october twenty seventh
october twentieth
october thirteenth
october sixth

september twenty-ninth
september twenty-second
september fifteenth
september eighth
september first

august twenty-fifth
august eighteenth
august eleventh
august fourth

July twenty-eighth
July twenty-first
July fourteenth
July seventh

June thirtieth
June twenty-third
June sixteenth
June ninth
June second

may twenty sixth
may nineteenth
may twelveth
may fifth

april twenty-eighth
april twenty-first
april fourteenth
april seventh

march thirty-first
march twenty-fourth
march seventeenth
march tenth
march third

february twenty-fourth
february seventeenth
february tenth
february third

posted at: 2002-06-03 08:28:37 with 0 comments
before i forget this after a deluge of news, read this article about larry king live: it's hilarious and totally true; i never understood why people wanted to watch LKl, let alone go on the show; of all the cnn shows, save the pile of intellectual sloth called talkbalk live, larry king live is the least informative and interesting. the fact that he mixes famous actors and politicians seems to underscore the point that larry doesn't interview news-worthy people so much as he interviews celebrities. furthermore, he's been given his own column entitled "kings things" courtesy the good folks at aol-time-warner-cnn. read it here and laugh your head off...yes, it's true, he actually discusses barney, the indy 500 and arianna huffington, in a series of sentences. Twenty sentences. anyone who's used to length will be sadly disappointed, but given mr. king's faulknerian stream of idiocy, that's not a bad thing.
posted at: 2002-06-03 07:44:36 with 0 comments
i can tell it's a slow news day when i've already exhausted my extensive list of news sources before 9:00 and still have little to post on. anyway, in the "it's news despite the fact that it's not news" department, the israelis are attempting to remodel palestine while they simultaneously expand quickly in an action described as "relatively legal". say what you want to about the 1967 border...but there's no justification for further annexation of land in the occupied territories, something the geneva convention prohibits. read this and try to keep an open mind about everything. my life's problems are very insignificant by comparison.
posted at: 2002-05-31 09:14:44 with 0 comments
okay, to begin with, i'd like to critique the new usda method of food distribution with respect to french fry consumption. in the past, the usda cafeteria simply sold boardwalk fries in the traditional tub containers. this presented problems for those of us too hungry for the "small" size, as few large containers were ever put on display; in an effort to remedy this, tptb decided to simply provide the empty containers along with some tongs to put the fries in the container; this enabled utility minded individuals, like yt, to physically cram in as many fries as possible into the container, in clear compensation for the horrible fry space packing that has been visited upon us for years in the form of mcdonald's super-size, burger king's king size, or wendy's biggie size bait and switch techniques. yet today, upon my return to the caf, i discovered that they had moved to the old system again (albeit with new containers). argh! speaking of not getting what you voted...er...paid for, there's a great piece on ari fleischer here in tnr today. As i watched the west wing last night i thought to myself, does ari ever engage in panic-driven moments of conscience? or is he so clueless that he believes his own lies? the answer is, of course, that ari intellectual gimics have twisted his mind into in-spin-anity;
posted at: 2002-05-30 12:05:23 with 0 comments

go back a week...

...go forward a week